King william i

King William I         Americans these days be too spoiled. license and abomination are far too rampant. What perpetually happened to the peachy hoar days of unkind, bloodthirsty monarchs? Rulers who would send the citizens quivering with the unsullied call forth of their names. Kings whose wanton cruelty and disregard for hu world life blithe and amused us all. There is iodin occasion, and unmatchable amour alone, that we as a nation motif to return us to the subservient, useless entities that we truly are. That one thing is a male monarch. What remediate macrocosm for the job than William Jefferson Clinton?         A fagot and Bill Clinton are so utterly variant that I drive in I must good for you(p) crazy, but just embrace this idea, hitherto ludicrous it may sound, for just a moment. I correspond think roughly it. Would it be that often of a trade? Clinton is already, by far, the or so fibrous homo in the universe. le t us just analyze the things that made a king and the things that bear witness Bill Clinton.         First of all, a king was suitable to betroth war with whomever he wanted, with emerge the thanksgiving of a legislative body. Is that non what Clinton did former this year? We waged a war with a country tens of thousands of miles by under the flag of NATO, which Clinton practically controls allway. He used the unify Nations as an excuse to intervene in something that didnt concern us because it was in the best interests of adult malekind as a upstanding. That was not unlike the Treaty of Vienna in the 19th century. The approve basically gave the virtually big business humannessful nations in Europe the well(p) to intervene and interfere in any conflict or uprising that was deemed harmful to the rest of Europe. The treaty was written by countries where, by and large, monarchy was still prevalent. So it would not be much of a change to just defecate Cl inton a king because he is already the virt! ually mogulful man in the universe.         Kings were also able to enact any righteousnesss they saw fit, again, without the approval of a legislative body. Has Clinton not through this already? deem the partial-birth abortion law for example. direct I support a womans properly to abort her child but, in my opinion, this goes too far. This regularity of contraception was overwhelmingly opposed by some(prenominal) the raise and Senate, both Republican controlled. The Republicans did everything in their baron to defeat this bill. However, along come Bubba and all of a sudden women have the right to have this atrocity performed on their partly born child. This power makes Clinton one step closer to being a king. So why not make it ordained? He is already the to the highest degree powerful man in the universe.         Kings were also higher up the law itself. No king was ever removed for rift a law. Neither was Clinton. He has rugged numer ous law and committed traitorous acts during his presidency. For example the Whitewater thing. He abused his power as Arkansas state governor to further a multi-million dollar real estate study it on in which he was going to profit immensely. Was he charged? No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         He has repeatedly accepted nonlegal campaign contributions from former(a) nations in rally for favors. Take the Chinese businessmen for example. Their illegal contributions served as pack on the Lincoln bedroom. That sordid miniature act has ruined the prestige of the Lincoln bedroom, perhaps forever. Was he charged or even reprimanded. No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         He has also repeatedly sold American patents to the Chinese. Again, was he reprimanded? This traitorous act was treat by both the American justice system and the American people. Want to roll in the h ay why? Because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful! man in the universe.

         permit us not forget the whole impeachment fiasco. Clinton admittedly committed perjury in a affirmation to the grand jury in the Paula Jones internal harassment slipperiness (which I will get to later). lying under adjuration is a felony. Was Clinton charged, removed from office, or even formally reprimanded? No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         Which brings me to my last-place point: marital infidelity and moral ambiguity. Kings were cruel and pitiless and concubines were rampant in the royal court. Back then if one was powerful, mistresses were looked upon as an unnecessary evil. Did that not already happen with Clinton?          allow us go through the list of some of the women he has had either sex with or has sexually harassed. The three most famous names are Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers, and the now infamous Monica Lewinsky. Was he punished for his infidelity? Of course not. We even reelected him. Want to hold up why? Because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         A fine example of his moral ambiguity is the whole marijuana thing. This was before we even elected him. He admittedly smoked an illegal substance. Was he punished? No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe. some(a) business leader say to impeach him or just to ask this out because he is leaving in just over a year anyway. However, I say no to this because he office be replaced with someone just as stinking or worse, such as Al Gore, the most dense ma n in the country. We made the mistake once, we can ma! ke it again. The however available solution is to make him our unquestioned lord and master, Now I ask, is that so bad? If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay